New? Free Sign Up
Then check our Welcome Center to a Community Caring about Sleep Apnea diagnosis and Sleep Apnea treatment:
CPAP machines, Sleep Apnea surgery and dental appliances.
Tags:
RL,
As a patient, I'm not sure I believe in "idiopathic" central apnea. To me, that is a fancy way of saying "we don't know why they are happening, so we'll just say there is no reason." Sometimes centrals occur in reaction to PAP therapy but then slowly go away over time as the body gets used to PAP. If the centrals continue, even months later, then it is time to see what else is going on, in my opinion, even if ASV deals with the symptoms.
Treatment for Complex SA may sometimes involve trying simple CPAP, CPAP with O2, bilevel, bilevel with O2, ASV, or medication, or combinations of machine and medication. My position, personally, as a patient, is that APAP or autobilevel are not so much indicated.
But a thorough examination of the neurological and cardiovascular systems, perhaps by more than one doctor, would be in order, in my opinion, if you are continuing to have a lot of centrals, regardless of what else is done, to see if any cause can be found. Other than that, trying some of the treatments above are mostly about finding something that keeps you numbers within reason and that keeps you feeling as good as you can feel.
Your numbers (spO2 and events) and how you feel during the day should be monitored by you as you and your team figure out whether O2 is doing you any good and if so at what amount. Watching it all over time and keeping good records is the key, until a cause is found.
Hope it goes well.
jeff
If the centrals during a sleep study were from 'clinical intolerance' of PAP therapy (in other words, pressurized air itself seemed to trigger centrals), then it makes sense to let you use CPAP for a while to see if the centrals go away on their own. And if they do mostly go away, then staying on CPAP would make sense, since a few centrals now and then are no big deal. That is important for you as a patient to understand, if that actually is the case, because that helps you see that you were given CPAP not merely to set you up to fail it but likely to see if it actually solves the problems over time. My understanding is that this approach is more up-to-date than putting every patient who presents with an increase of centrals during titration immediately on ASV without seeing first if the patient eventually does OK on CPAP or bilevel.
Some docs might jump straight to ASV. But I agree with not doing that. See if CPAP helps first. If it does, after a few weeks of letting the body get used to it so that it doesn't have as many centrals, then GREAT! And not just financially but all the way around. The more modern approach to Complex SA is to see if it resolves WITHOUT ASV on CPAP or bilevel. And trying O2 is something to try, too. It is more than a checklist for qualifying you for another machine. It is an attempt to keep you from having to go on a machine that is less pleasant for many patients than CPAP.
It also makes sense to me to use an auto to get data and to do a mini-titration. But my personal preference would be NOT to use the auto mode for treatment. The body is more likely to get used to PAP therapy and resolve its own centrals, in my opinion, on straight CPAP mode than if the pressures are jumping around in auto mode. But that is nitpicking on my part, and I'm sure the doc knows more about it than I do, especially if, as the RT put it, the doc is picky. That is a good thing, I think.
I am not a medical professional, so be sure to take my take with a grain of salt. My opinions are based only on what I've read in studies, in reference works, and from patients in the apnea forums.
jeff
© 2025 Created by The SleepGuide Crew.
Powered by