New? Free Sign Up
Then check our Welcome Center to a Community Caring about Sleep Apnea diagnosis and Sleep Apnea treatment:
CPAP machines, Sleep Apnea surgery and dental appliances.
I was diagnosed with sleep apnea severe and obstructive but the diagnosis at DENT Neuro Institute cited caused by esophogeal narrowing, soft pallet elongation, anterior surgical intervention and cardiomyopathy. The Sleep Apnea was secondary to the medical conditions cited and always is.
I was impressed with DENTS thorough diagnosis. Some places they will only state: Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea. I wanted to know why I have it and they told me.
Has anyone else had a comprehensive exam to determine what else is causing their sleep apnea since sleep apnea cannot exist without some other medical condition. I am hoping this will cause others to think about the possible underlying causes of their sleep apnea.
The goal, is to get people thinking about the real cause of their sleep apnea stimulating those suffering from sleep apnea to ask questions to their treating medical provider like, why can't i get off this Cpap? Response from physician should be: well if you lose the weight or if we remove partial soft pallet tissue or scar tissue, or maybe we can try Coreg to help stregnthen your heart muscle, or lets look into your brain signals functions or lets reduce the amount of narcotics you are on. This is what your physician should be stating to you and hopfully they have.
Wearing a Cpap is a tasking, miserable and downright horiffic experience to have on and taking care of it can be a task in itself. I cannot imaine going camping and having to take my Cpap with me. Why not look further into the underlying causes of why one has sleep apnea and try to fix the medical condition first? how many here have really gone through this and who have really asked what is causing my sleep apnea????
Tags:
It is crucial to know the exact location of the obstruction when considering the possibility of surgery. Other than that, it doesn't really matter. Most who have apnea surgeries, with a few rare exceptions of course, still have to use CPAP to fully treat their obstructive apnea, if they want to feel their best while they are awake. Generally speaking, surgery may help, but only tracheotomy cures apnea. The rest may lessen, but don't cure. The major jaw surgeries can come really, really close, but they are quite major surgeries that are much more life-altering than simple, easy-to-use PAP therapy.
Eventually you will make peace with the idea of how easy PAP therapy is, relatively speaking. It is not nearly as big a deal (for most) as many people seem, at first, to make out of the idea of it. You only have to wear it at night, while you are unconcious. What could be easier and less invasive to waking life than that?!! It works beautifully. Batteries are small for camping. It is not much more of a hassle than remembering to take a toothbrush and some underwear.
Surgeries are for people who can't make CPAP work for them and so have to settle for second-best treatment or have to get surgery to make their PAP therapy more effective. Surgeries are expensive, have side-effects, are mostly not reversible, and rarely end up allowing a person to deal with OSA very effectively on their own. Most end up going on CPAP after surgery anyway, if they want to feel their best. If you can make PAP work well without surgery, the best ENTs will not even consider you a candidate for surgery.
There is a process of denial and mourning you go through. We all do. But after that is over, you realize that the gold-standard for treating apnea really isn't all that bad. You don't have to mutilate yourself to use it, and it only adds about 5 minutes to your morning routine of getting ready for the day. CPAP works GREAT! For the majority, anyway. You will come to love that machine, believe it or not, once it represents how you feel every morning after using it. You won't dread taking it camping--you will be eager to and will look forward to it.
I know you don't want to hear that right now. But I said it because it is true and you need to hear it, in my opinion.
jeff
I have no argument with your statements. I apologize if mine seemed to be in conflict with that. And I appreciate your post for balancing how I may have overstated my position in my attempt to counteract the orignial poster's implications as I percieved them.
I agree 100% that many are helped by surgery. And I am not against that. I am especially impressed when someone having difficulty with PAP therapy is helped to make it more effective. Good surgeons do good work.
But when a patient has an uninformed aversion to the idea of PAP therapy and is then, in my opinion, preyed upon by a few bad eggs who promise that there is no need even to consider PAP because there are simple surgeries that solve the root cause of the problem completely, better than PAP, I take issue with that approach, myself. Obviously, from your words, you are not one with the approach I have trouble with.
For me, to my way of thinking, the most balanced surgeon I've heard on the matter posting here regularly is Dr. Park. I am impressed how he makes sure patients give PAP the full shot and how he never makes false promises about what he does.
My statements are not meant to attempt to trump the experts and practitioners. Patients need to know the percentages when they make choices. And the idea of a simple surgery lowering AHI as effectively as PAP can be a particularly alluring one to many patients trying to figure out whether they should consider PAP therapy.
It is my opinion that good surgeons will not give the impression that, for example, "UPPP should be tried first before trying PAP, since UPPP will get at the root of the problem and prevent the need of ever considering PAP again." Too many unsuspecting patients have heard that over the years and have swallowed that line, including the hook and sinker. I don't doubt the motives of the surgeons. But with good surgeons like Dr. Park spreading the word on the true state of affairs these days, there is no excuse for a surgeon being that uneducated today, in my opinion.
Teresa Hoehn said:Hi Jeff,
Surgery can work for some people depending on the severity of the OSA and also the anitomical problems. Surgery has proven to be helpful about 50% of the time if the patient has mild to moderate OSA. People that have severe sleep apnea rarely have resolution of OSA but often are able to decrease the amount of pressure needed with their PAP devices.
Your comment about the CPAP being the best alternative may be true depending on the patients ability to tolerate PAP therapy. I agree that in most cases I am able to assist my patients in CPAP verse surgery. Unfortunately I can name 4 patients that went through multiple surgeries including UVPP, Jaw advancements and Nasal surgery to find they still had OSA. In one case the patients AHI was 67 before surgery and 62 after. He was able to go from a CPAP pressure of 18 to 12. Not able to get rid of CPAP and the surgery was very painful. I alway recommend to my patient to at least try the CPAP it's way less painful and invasive.
CPAP may seem a chore but look at the alternatives.
Teresa
j n k said:It is crucial to know the exact location of the obstruction when considering the possibility of surgery. Other than that, it doesn't really matter. Most who have apnea surgeries, with a few rare exceptions of course, still have to use CPAP to fully treat their obstructive apnea, if they want to feel their best while they are awake. Generally speaking, surgery may help, but only tracheotomy cures apnea. The rest may lessen, but don't cure. The major jaw surgeries can come really, really close, but they are quite major surgeries that are much more life-altering than simple, easy-to-use PAP therapy.
Eventually you will make peace with the idea of how easy PAP therapy is, relatively speaking. It is not nearly as big a deal (for most) as many people seem, at first, to make out of the idea of it. You only have to wear it at night, while you are unconcious. What could be easier and less invasive to waking life than that?!! It works beautifully. Batteries are small for camping. It is not much more of a hassle than remembering to take a toothbrush and some underwear.
Surgeries are for people who can't make CPAP work for them and so have to settle for second-best treatment or have to get surgery to make their PAP therapy more effective. Surgeries are expensive, have side-effects, are mostly not reversible, and rarely end up allowing a person to deal with OSA very effectively on their own. Most end up going on CPAP after surgery anyway, if they want to feel their best. If you can make PAP work well without surgery, the best ENTs will not even consider you a candidate for surgery.
There is a process of denial and mourning you go through. We all do. But after that is over, you realize that the gold-standard for treating apnea really isn't all that bad. You don't have to mutilate yourself to use it, and it only adds about 5 minutes to your morning routine of getting ready for the day. CPAP works GREAT! For the majority, anyway. You will come to love that machine, believe it or not, once it represents how you feel every morning after using it. You won't dread taking it camping--you will be eager to and will look forward to it.
I know you don't want to hear that right now. But I said it because it is true and you need to hear it, in my opinion.
jeff
I was impressed with DENTS thorough diagnosis. Some places they will only state: Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea. I wanted to know why I have it and they told me.>
Richard, If you don't mind me asking, where did you get your information that OSA is always secondary to another medical condition?
I have other medical conditions- essential tremor, hypothyroid, some cognitive and memory problems (treated successfully with Aricept), bipolar disorder. For me it's a question of the chicken and the egg. I was born in 1952, came of age in the 70's, and have many indiscretions in my past. My depression came first as a teenager, other problems as an adult. Some of these conditions- primarily cognition and memory may be a result of OSA, but I doubt they are the cause. I've been pretty thoroughly examined and scanned so I don't think there are many stones left unturned. My impression is that my OSA is a separate entity caused by upper airway blockage despite airflow drive.
That is it may be seconday to another condition, but not necessarily.
I have also learned that the less invasive the treatment, the better it is. General anesthesia is not to be taken lightly and it's is necessary for any surgery
Mary Z.
Richard, you raise some interesting questions. What exactly was the diagnosis underlying your OSA?
You seem to have a medical background, would you elaborate?
I find my CPAP to be easy to handle, falling sleep on my feet at 8:30 in the morning and not being able to drive due to excessive sleepiness was not. I would like to hear more about your background and reasoning. I also would like to see the results of the sleep study that showed your OSA was cured.
You make some strong statements.
Thanks,
Mary Z.
© 2025 Created by The SleepGuide Crew.
Powered by