New? Free Sign Up
Then check our Welcome Center to a Community Caring about Sleep Apnea diagnosis and Sleep Apnea treatment:
CPAP machines, Sleep Apnea surgery and dental appliances.
Hello, I was asked to post this as a new discussion topic. I wanted to provide some information on the Oral Systemic Balance (OSB). I am not a dentist, I am a professor. I have had migraines for 36 years, have had every treatment from acupuncture to Zanadine (muscle relaxant). The migraines usually came twice a week, and lasted 1-3 days. You can see how this would define my life. I got the OSB (oral systemic balance) dental device from Dr. Lawler, and have not had a migraine in 3 months. I'm one of the people Dr. Lawler has videotaped. All I can say is, I hope the dental and medical communities embrace this research so others can benefit as I have. Dr. Lawler is studying with Dr. Farrand Robson of Tacoma Washington.
Tags:
To the docs in this discussion: First of all I understand your frustration with UARS and RERAS. This is something that I have fought over at least once a week in every lab that I have worked in.
These questions are not meant to belittle your product. I really want to know more about it. I understand that the way a person feels is a much better parameter than any number I can come up with in a lab. I also know that there are millions of people out there who feel great that have untreated OSA. I was one of them. How do you measure your success without having a sleep study done before and after? Dr. Dement talks in many of his publications on how even a small increase in sleep efficiency can make a bad sleeper feel like they have more energy. He also discusses how this energy can be short lived if the source of the bad sleep is not rooted out and finally eliminated.
As I understand it success on the oral devices,as well as many other OSA treatment options, is a 50% reduction in AHI. in the case of UARS it would be a reduction in RDI. if a person has an RDI of 40 and your product reduces it to 20 that is great. Won't the RDI of 20 eventually catch up to the person? Is it possible that they could relapse in a few years? What about the stress on the heart that an RDI or AHI of 20 would produce? Most apnea fighting surgeries only have a shelf life of about 6 years according to studies. None can combat or prevent an increase in apnea due to weight gain or aging like PAP therapy(short of a trach). What does your product do to prevent a relapse? How would you know?
Hi Dr. Lawler, I need one of those devices for my mouth at night. I am loosing my back teeth because of my grinding even tho I have a mask that says it takes care of the grinding but it dosen't so before I have false teeth I have to find out the price and if my insurance will pay for it. Bertabee1
Rock this is a great discussion and I appreciate your question.
In our practice we utilize unattended home monitoring to see if a PSG is warranted on many new patients who present for treatment. A very significant amount of the time, based on home testing, there is no possibility of getting a diagnosis for obstructive sleep apnea. The ones that we struggle with are those on the borderline. Getting a diagnosis for OSA certainly helps with insurance reimbursement. Studies show that home sleep monitoring can be more consistent in identifying mild obstructive sleep apnea because patients are sleeping in a familiar environment and there is less variability in their sleep patterns. It is really frustrating for all of us to attempt to get a diagnosis when the home sleep study shows a significant issue in a patient with symptoms and, yet, the patient didn't desaturate enough in the sleep lab. So the variability is not in the scoring but in the sleeping and breathing.
Certainly we are going for symptom relief, but we are also trying to normalize breathing as much as possible. So we are aiming to get the AHI under 5. (A 50% reduction in AHI is a criteria that is used in palatal surgery but not oral appliances.) Again, in my practice, home sleep monitoring is utilized to assess our level of success. Ideally a follow-up PSG is done but few patients will go back to the sleep lab once they feel better. I am very pleased that Carl, went back to the sleep lab to evaluate his Oral Systemic Balance mandibular repositioning appliance. His PSG and his home sleep study with the Watch PAT home monitor were in lock step agreement. I would defy CPAP to manage him as well as his oral appliance and he certainly felt better than when he was on CPAP. And we were lucky. Had we not been lucky, we could have combined his oral appliance with CPAP and allow for more comfortable CPAP use. Carl was perfectly compliant with CPAP. It just wasn't working well for him.
As to relapse over time, there is very little about the body that is static. We all deal with that. I have dental patients who have been on CPAP for years with no follow up, even with significant weight gain. Are they stable? In this regard, we do the best we can in helping patients stay healthy. And I can tell you that getting patients who feel good to come back for additional testing is a tough sell.
Rock Hinkle said:To the docs in this discussion: First of all I understand your frustration with UARS and RERAS. This is something that I have fought over at least once a week in every lab that I have worked in.
These questions are not meant to belittle your product. I really want to know more about it. I understand that the way a person feels is a much better parameter than any number I can come up with in a lab. I also know that there are millions of people out there who feel great that have untreated OSA. I was one of them. How do you measure your success without having a sleep study done before and after? Dr. Dement talks in many of his publications on how even a small increase in sleep efficiency can make a bad sleeper feel like they have more energy. He also discusses how this energy can be short lived if the source of the bad sleep is not rooted out and finally eliminated.
As I understand it success on the oral devices,as well as many other OSA treatment options, is a 50% reduction in AHI. in the case of UARS it would be a reduction in RDI. if a person has an RDI of 40 and your product reduces it to 20 that is great. Won't the RDI of 20 eventually catch up to the person? Is it possible that they could relapse in a few years? What about the stress on the heart that an RDI or AHI of 20 would produce? Most apnea fighting surgeries only have a shelf life of about 6 years according to studies. None can combat or prevent an increase in apnea due to weight gain or aging like PAP therapy(short of a trach). What does your product do to prevent a relapse? How would you know?
Thank you for your response Dr.Lawler. While I do not have alot of faith in the current HST technology I am very glad to here that you are using the Watchpat to evaluate your patients. I strongly feel that this is the best one on the market at this time.
Can an HST evaluation accurately Dx for UARs? Do you have any screenshots of the events you are marking?
FYI if any of you think that you may have UARS seek out a pediatric sleep doctor. They will have much more experience in this particular disordeand the events that go with it.
David E. Lawler DDS D.ABDSM said:Rock this is a great discussion and I appreciate your question.
In our practice we utilize unattended home monitoring to see if a PSG is warranted on many new patients who present for treatment. A very significant amount of the time, based on home testing, there is no possibility of getting a diagnosis for obstructive sleep apnea. The ones that we struggle with are those on the borderline. Getting a diagnosis for OSA certainly helps with insurance reimbursement. Studies show that home sleep monitoring can be more consistent in identifying mild obstructive sleep apnea because patients are sleeping in a familiar environment and there is less variability in their sleep patterns. It is really frustrating for all of us to attempt to get a diagnosis when the home sleep study shows a significant issue in a patient with symptoms and, yet, the patient didn't desaturate enough in the sleep lab. So the variability is not in the scoring but in the sleeping and breathing.
Certainly we are going for symptom relief, but we are also trying to normalize breathing as much as possible. So we are aiming to get the AHI under 5. (A 50% reduction in AHI is a criteria that is used in palatal surgery but not oral appliances.) Again, in my practice, home sleep monitoring is utilized to assess our level of success. Ideally a follow-up PSG is done but few patients will go back to the sleep lab once they feel better. I am very pleased that Carl, went back to the sleep lab to evaluate his Oral Systemic Balance mandibular repositioning appliance. His PSG and his home sleep study with the Watch PAT home monitor were in lock step agreement. I would defy CPAP to manage him as well as his oral appliance and he certainly felt better than when he was on CPAP. And we were lucky. Had we not been lucky, we could have combined his oral appliance with CPAP and allow for more comfortable CPAP use. Carl was perfectly compliant with CPAP. It just wasn't working well for him.
As to relapse over time, there is very little about the body that is static. We all deal with that. I have dental patients who have been on CPAP for years with no follow up, even with significant weight gain. Are they stable? In this regard, we do the best we can in helping patients stay healthy. And I can tell you that getting patients who feel good to come back for additional testing is a tough sell.
Rock Hinkle said:To the docs in this discussion: First of all I understand your frustration with UARS and RERAS. This is something that I have fought over at least once a week in every lab that I have worked in.
These questions are not meant to belittle your product. I really want to know more about it. I understand that the way a person feels is a much better parameter than any number I can come up with in a lab. I also know that there are millions of people out there who feel great that have untreated OSA. I was one of them. How do you measure your success without having a sleep study done before and after? Dr. Dement talks in many of his publications on how even a small increase in sleep efficiency can make a bad sleeper feel like they have more energy. He also discusses how this energy can be short lived if the source of the bad sleep is not rooted out and finally eliminated.
As I understand it success on the oral devices,as well as many other OSA treatment options, is a 50% reduction in AHI. in the case of UARS it would be a reduction in RDI. if a person has an RDI of 40 and your product reduces it to 20 that is great. Won't the RDI of 20 eventually catch up to the person? Is it possible that they could relapse in a few years? What about the stress on the heart that an RDI or AHI of 20 would produce? Most apnea fighting surgeries only have a shelf life of about 6 years according to studies. None can combat or prevent an increase in apnea due to weight gain or aging like PAP therapy(short of a trach). What does your product do to prevent a relapse? How would you know?
You are very correct. I appreciate your honesty. I have been talking about false positives with the HSTs for sometime now. The military has done several studies on the technology behind the Watchpat listing it's limitations at recording sleep problems. basically the military said that it was "just" good enough for their needs. I believe that they said the same thing about the Hummer as well.
I do not see it possible to Dx UARS via this program. It's tough to see flow limitation on these units let alone arousals. Thanks foir the answers to my questions. Good luck!
© 2025 Created by The SleepGuide Crew.
Powered by