"please keep me updated about oximeters "
Sleep Apnea Forum Bringing Power to the Patient
New? Free Sign Up
Then check our Welcome Center to a Community Caring about Sleep Apnea diagnosis and Sleep Apnea treatment:
CPAP machines, Sleep Apnea surgery and dental appliances.
CPAP Supplies
Latest Activity
Need New CPAP Machine
Richard Morgan writes;
Mike, I would like your recommendation on a good data capable cpap machine. I have been using the ResMed lightweight for years. Lately I have been so sleepy during the day. I know my mask leaks. I am going to try the Swift FX if I can get a hold of one. I really need help with the machine. When I had my sleep study, the insurance company wouldn't approve a study to see what the machine should be set for. So they had to guess and put it at 12 cm. I would appreciate your help or help from other members. Thank you.
Views: 319
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Mike on
-
i would suggest either the ResMed S9 or the Respironics System One Auto-PAP. Both are state of the art, data capable machines. As far as masks go, the ResMed Swift FX has gotten a lot of good reports from people using it.
-
Permalink Reply by Mary Z on
-
Good luck, Richard. Mike gives good machine recommendations. 12cm H2O sounds like a good place to start without a titrations study. If you're not feeling better you can always get the pressure changed. What was your previous pressure setting?
-
Permalink Reply by 99 on
-
there is a formula based on weight and a few other factors i do remember any more about the formula
can anyone remember seeing the formula
also an apap will auto titrate unlike some cpap
-
Permalink Reply by RockRpsgt on
-
The Resmed S8 is nice as well. Just in case your insurance will not pay for the newest machine. All 3 machines listed have an auto-PAP feature that will help you find the ideal pressure that you need.
-
Permalink Reply by Judy on
-
Hoffstein Calculation for Starting CPAP Pressure Titration
Predicting Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
Zoe Oliver, MSc and Victor Hoffstein, PhD, MD, FCCP
* From the Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, and Center for Sleep and Chronobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to: Victor Hoffstein, PhD, MD, FCCP; St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 1W8; e-mail: victor.hoffstein@utoronto.ca
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure required to abolish apneas as predicted from a previously derived algorithm (Ppred) with the true effective pressure (Peff) determined during a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration study.
Setting: Sleep clinic of a university hospital.
Methods: We prospectively studied 329 patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration. The following protocol was employed. Titration began at a pressure (Ppred) calculated from a previously derived equation based on body mass index, neck circumference, and apnea/hypopnea index (AHI). If AHI at Ppred was > 10, the pressure was increased in steps of 1 cm H2O until AHI became < 10. If, on the other hand, AHI at Ppred was < 10, the pressure was reduced in increments of 1 cm H2O until AHI became > 10. The lowest pressure that abolishes sleep apnea is defined as the Peff. Paired t tests, linear correlation, and distribution of (Ppred - Peff) were used to compare Peff and Ppred.
Results: Successful titration was accomplished in 276 patients (84%). Mean Ppred was similar to mean Peff (8.1 ± 2.2 vs 8.1 ± 2.6 cm H2O, respectively). There was a significant correlation between these two pressures (r = 0.73; p = 0.0001). Examination of the distribution of (Peff - Ppred) revealed that in 63% of patients, Ppred was within ± 1 cm H2O of Peff; in 83% of patients, the two measures were within ± 2 cm H2O; and in 95%, within ± 3 cm H2O.
Conclusion: We conclude that pressure predicted from an algorithm based on simple anthropometric and sleep variables constitutes a good starting point for CPAP titration, allowing the optimum pressure to be achieved with only a few incremental changes.
Key Words: continuous positive airway pressure • prediction • sleep apnea • titration
[] Introduction
Since its advent in 1981, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been the cornerstone of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. To determine the lowest true effective pressure required to abolish apneas (Peff) for home use, a CPAP titration is performed, during which the pressure is varied until apneas are abolished.
There is no standard CPAP titration protocol. Occasionally the titration is unsuccessful: it is possible to run out of sleep time before Peff is determined. Considering this, the prediction algorithms are attractive because they provide a convenient starting point for CPAP titration. Ideally, this should reduce the number of incremental pressure changes during the night and increase the amount of sleep time spent at each pressure, particularly at the effective pressure that will be recommended for home use. There are several algorithms based on anthropometric, clinical, and baseline polysomnographic data.1 2 However, the predictive utility of these algorithms has not been assessed in large prospective studies. Consequently, the main purpose of the present study was to test such an algorithm in a large group of patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration study.
[] Materials and Methods
We studied 329 patients with diagnosed sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration study at St. Michael’s Hospital sleep laboratory. All of them had sleep apnea, defined as an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of > 10, confirmed by the initial diagnostic polysomnography performed in the same laboratory.
A standard procedure, described previously,1 was employed. The starting pressure was determined from the prediction formula utilizing body mass index (BMI), neck circumference (NC), and the AHI determined during diagnostic polysomnography:
Ppred = (0.16 x BMI) + (0.13 x NC) + (0.04 x AHI) - 5.12
[]CPAP titration study began with the pressure set to Ppred rounded off to the nearest integer. If the AHI at this pressure was < 10, the pressure was decreased in 1 cm H2O increments until the AHI became > 10. If the AHI at Ppred was > 10, the pressure was increased in 1 cm H2O increments until the AHI became < 10. The effective CPAP (Peff) was defined as the lowest pressure at which the patient had an AHI of < 10.
To study the relationship between Ppred and the measured Peff, the data were analyzed in several ways. First, we compared mean values of Peff and Ppred using the paired t test. Second, we used correlation analysis to determine the relationship between these two pressures. Lastly, we examined the histogram of (Peff - Ppred) to determine how well Ppred approximated Peff in individual patients.
[] Results
There were 54 women and 275 men. Their anthropometric and sleep data are given in Table 1 . As a group, the patients were obese, middle-aged, and had moderately severe sleep apnea.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Anthropometric and Sleep Data in All Patients
Adequate titrations were achieved in 276 patients. In the remaining 53 patients, the optimum pressure could not be determined. Table 2 summarizes the results for all patients grouped according to the success of titration. Those with unsuccessful titration are further divided into groups. One group are "overestimated" patients, ie, those in whom AHI was < 10 at Ppred, with an AHI of > 10 not achieved at any pressure. The other group are the "underestimated" patients, ie, those with an AHI > 10 at Ppred, in whom an AHI of < 10 was not achieved at any pressure.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Anthropometric and Sleep Data in Patients According to Success of CPAP Titration*
Generally, patients in whom the algorithm overestimated the pressure tended to be less overweight and had milder sleep apnea than patients in the other two groups. This is may be seen from the mean values for AHI given in Table 2 , and also from the fact that 50% of the overpredicted group had an AHI of < 27, whereas 50% of the underpredicted and successful groups had AHIs of > 44 and > 41, respectively.
In the remaining 276 patients, the titration (whether up or down from the predicted value) was adequate, with the results summarized in Table 3 .
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Patients With Successful CPAP Titration
There was no significant difference between Peff and Ppred (p = 0.46); both variables were significantly correlated (r = 0.73; p = 0.0001).
The relationship between the Ppred and Peff is better seen by examining the distribution of the differences between these two pressures (Fig 1 ).
[]
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
Figure 1. Histogram of the differences between effective and predicted pressures.
We note that in 63% of patients, Ppred was within ± 1 cm H2O of Peff; in 83% of patients, the two pressures were within ± 2 cm H2O; and in 95%, within ± 3 cm H2O.
[] Discussion
We examined a large group of patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration study, using a method that employed a predicted formula to initiate the titration. We found that (1) adequate CPAP titration can be achieved in 84% of patients; and (2) in 83% of patients, the optimum pressure lies within ± 2 cm H2O of the predicted pressure.
We employed a relatively unique, individualized, manual CPAP titration protocol, and did not compare it with any other methods simply because there are no standard protocols. Many laboratories begin titration at 4 or 5 cm H2O, increasing pressures in increments of 1 or 2 cm H2O every 10 to 60 min. However, for a patient who requires > 10 cm H2O pressure to abolish his/her sleep apnea, such a protocol may be inadequate. There may not be enough time for proper titration, or sleep time spent at each pressure may be too short to sample all sleep stages and all positions. There is the danger that the effective pressure determined during the CPAP titration study will be inadequate during a full night of sleep at home. Using the algorithm proposed here would allow Peff to be reached sooner and minimize the risk of running out of time.
Because there is no standard CPAP titration protocol, the criteria for an effective protocol are not clear. It seems reasonable to assume that an effective protocol will have the following: (1) a low rate of unsuccessful titrations, (2) little difference between AHI at Peff as determined during the titration night and AHI at the same pressure during all-night polysomnography, and (3) few pressure increments required to attain Peff during the titration night. There are no data in the literature regarding the first two points. However, there are recent studies3 4 5 6 that allow one to determine the number of pressure increments. All of these studies were performed for the purpose of assessing auto-titrating devices, and in some of them manual CPAP titrations were also carried out. Although none of the authors commented on the number of pressure changes required to achieve the optimum CPAP, we can estimate this from the knowledge of starting pressure, optimum pressure, and pressure increment. In all studies, the initial pressure was 3 to 5 cm H2O, and the final effective pressure was between 7 and 12 cm H2O. Assuming the pressure increment of 1 cm H2O, the number of pressure changes necessary to achieve the effective pressure would be between 3 and 10. In the present study, using a CPAP titration protocol based on the predicted pressure, we found that the mean number of pressure changes was one, ranging from zero to five.
With the development of auto-titrating CPAP systems, manual titrations may soon become a relic of the past. Is it therefore futile to develop and test prediction algorithms for calculating effective CPAP? We do not think so, because even the automated systems require the user to specify starting, minimum, and maximum pressures. Our results indicate that using Ppred to start auto-CPAP and specifying a ± 4 cm H2O range around it will ensure resolution of sleep apnea in almost all patients. In fact, Series and Marc7 concluded in a recent study that the prediction algorithm tested here can be used together with an automatic CPAP system to initiate CPAP titration at home, without a separate titration study.
Another potential use of prediction algorithm is during split-night studies8 and daytime titrations,9 when sleep time available for CPAP titration is short. In such studies, the likelihood of successful titration is increased when the starting pressure is close to the effective pressure, thus requiring fewer pressure increments and increasing the likelihood of successful titration.
We found that in 53 of 329 patients (16%), CPAP titration was inadequate. It is difficult to put this result in proper perspective, because there is no information in the literature on the rate of titration failures seen in sleep laboratories. We attempted to uncover the reasons for this by carefully reviewing the records of patients with failed titrations with respect to the diagnosis, severity of apnea, or anthropometric variables. Although no consistent pattern emerged for all patients, the following facts may explain some of the failures.
There were 11 patients in whom the algorithm was a gross underestimate: AHI was > 10 at Ppred and never dropped to < 10 during titration. However, these patients all belong to a group of apneics in whom CPAP titration may be expected to be difficult. Four had central sleep apnea (which frequently does not respond to CPAP), one had inadequate titration due to persistent leak around the mask, two did not sleep at higher pressures, two had mild sleep apnea (initial AHIs, 14 and 20; final AHIs, 12 and 13) and did not tolerate further increases in pressure, and the remaining two had severe sleep apnea (initial AHIs, 99 and 108, dropping to 25 and 24 at pressures of 15 and 16 cm H2O). In the two patients with severe sleep apnea, there was every indication that with further increases in pressure, AHI would fall to < 10.
There were 42 patients with mild sleep apnea (median AHI, 27) in whom the algorithm produced a gross overestimate of pressure. These patients had AHIs of < 10 at Ppred and never developed sleep apnea despite the pressure being lowered to as low as 3 cm H2O. In 27 of them, loud snoring reappeared during reduction in pressure to < 5 cm H2O; the sleep technologist decided against further reductions in pressure and stopped the titration protocol. In the other 15 patients, no consistent distinct pattern was found; perhaps these patients demonstrated a "false-positive" result during their diagnostic night. We reviewed their weight, alcohol intake, and medications, but could find no difference in these variables between the diagnostic and CPAP titration nights. It is possible that physiologic night-to-night variability in breathing in these patients with mild sleep apnea accounts for our findings.
We conclude that the prediction algorithm based on NC, BMI, and AHI is useful in calculating the starting pressure for initiating CPAP titration in the majority of patients with sleep apnea. Based on previous investigations,7 it may also be useful for autotitration at home. We must emphasize that the algorithm cannot replace a proper CPAP titration study10 ; its usefulness lies in facilitating the titration protocol, not in replacing it.
[] Footnotes
Abbreviations: AHI = apnea/hypopnea index; BMI = body mass index; CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure; NC = neck circumference; Peff = true effective pressure required to abolish apneas; Ppred = algorithm-predicted pressure required to abolish apneas
Received for publication May 5, 1999. Accepted for publication September 13, 1999.
[] References
Miljeteig, H, Hoffstein, V (1993) Determinants of continuous posi- tive airway pressure level for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 147,1526-1530[ISI][Medline]
Hoheisel, GB, Teschler, H (1994) Clinical parameters for the prescription of minimal effective CPAP for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149,A496
Stradling, JR, Barbour, C, Pitson, DJ, et al (1997) Automatic continuous positive airway pressure titration in the laboratory: patient outcomes. Thorax 52,72-75[Abstract]
Konerman, M, Sanner, BM, Vyleta, M, et al (1998) Use of conventional and self-adjusting nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a comparative study. Chest 113,714-718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ficker, JH, Wiest, GH, Lehnert, G, et al (1998) Evaluation of an auto-CPAP device for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Thorax 53,643-648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Scharf, MB, Brannen, DE, McDannold, MD, et al (1996) Computerized adjustable versus fixed NCAP treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 19,491-496[ISI][Medline]
Series, F, Marc, I (1997) Efficacy of automatic continuous positive pressure therapy that uses an estimated required pressure in the treatment of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med 127,588-595
Strollo, PJ, Jr, Sanders, MH, Costantion, JP, et al (1996) Split-night studies for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep 19,S255-S259[ISI][Medline]
Rosenthal, L, Nykamp, K, Guido, P, et al (1998) Daytime CPAP titration: a viable alternative for patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 114,1056-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gokcebay, N, Iqbal, S, Yang, K, et al (1996) Accuracy of CPAP predicted from anthropometric and polysomnographic indices. Sleep 19,600-601[ISI][Medline]
http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/117/4/1061
-
Permalink Reply by Richard Morgan on
-
That was my first, so it has always been 12 cm. It has made a great difference in my life. I used to fall asleep interviewing people in the ER. Talk about embarrassing.
Mary Z said:Good luck, Richard. Mike gives good machine recommendations. 12cm H2O sounds like a good place to start without a titrations study. If you're not feeling better you can always get the pressure changed. What was your previous pressure setting?
-
-
Thanks Rock, The only problem is they are a bit out of my price range at the moment. I need a less expensive alternative or just keep my ResMed S7 a while longer. I was jusr intrigued by the data capability of the newer ones.
99 said:there is a formula based on weight and a few other factors i do remember any more about the formula
can anyone remember seeing the formula
also an apap will auto titrate unlike some cpap
-
-
Thank you for all the tech info, but I am afraid it is over my head. What does an aneurism feel like? LOL. They must have guessed right about setting it for 12 cm, since I got tremendous results. Once while in the hospital for cardiac reasons, they put me on a cpap machine that you could adjust the pressure by a dial. I put it on 14 and was able to breathe much easier. Wonder if my PCP can write on the RX to set it for 14 cm?
Judy said:Hoffstein Calculation for Starting CPAP Pressure Titration
Predicting Effective Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
Zoe Oliver, MSc and Victor Hoffstein, PhD, MD, FCCP
* From the Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, and Center for Sleep and Chronobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to: Victor Hoffstein, PhD, MD, FCCP; St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 1W8; e-mail: victor.hoffstein@utoronto.ca
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure required to abolish apneas as predicted from a previously derived algorithm (Ppred) with the true effective pressure (Peff) determined during a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration study.
Setting: Sleep clinic of a university hospital.
Methods: We prospectively studied 329 patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration. The following protocol was employed. Titration began at a pressure (Ppred) calculated from a previously derived equation based on body mass index, neck circumference, and apnea/hypopnea index (AHI). If AHI at Ppred was > 10, the pressure was increased in steps of 1 cm H2O until AHI became < 10. If, on the other hand, AHI at Ppred was < 10, the pressure was reduced in increments of 1 cm H2O until AHI became > 10. The lowest pressure that abolishes sleep apnea is defined as the Peff. Paired t tests, linear correlation, and distribution of (Ppred - Peff) were used to compare Peff and Ppred.
Results: Successful titration was accomplished in 276 patients (84%). Mean Ppred was similar to mean Peff (8.1 ± 2.2 vs 8.1 ± 2.6 cm H2O, respectively). There was a significant correlation between these two pressures (r = 0.73; p = 0.0001). Examination of the distribution of (Peff - Ppred) revealed that in 63% of patients, Ppred was within ± 1 cm H2O of Peff; in 83% of patients, the two measures were within ± 2 cm H2O; and in 95%, within ± 3 cm H2O.
Conclusion: We conclude that pressure predicted from an algorithm based on simple anthropometric and sleep variables constitutes a good starting point for CPAP titration, allowing the optimum pressure to be achieved with only a few incremental changes.
Key Words: continuous positive airway pressure • prediction • sleep apnea • titration
[] Introduction
Since its advent in 1981, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been the cornerstone of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. To determine the lowest true effective pressure required to abolish apneas (Peff) for home use, a CPAP titration is performed, during which the pressure is varied until apneas are abolished.
There is no standard CPAP titration protocol. Occasionally the titration is unsuccessful: it is possible to run out of sleep time before Peff is determined. Considering this, the prediction algorithms are attractive because they provide a convenient starting point for CPAP titration. Ideally, this should reduce the number of incremental pressure changes during the night and increase the amount of sleep time spent at each pressure, particularly at the effective pressure that will be recommended for home use. There are several algorithms based on anthropometric, clinical, and baseline polysomnographic data.1 2 However, the predictive utility of these algorithms has not been assessed in large prospective studies. Consequently, the main purpose of the present study was to test such an algorithm in a large group of patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration study.
[] Materials and Methods
We studied 329 patients with diagnosed sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration study at St. Michael’s Hospital sleep laboratory. All of them had sleep apnea, defined as an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of > 10, confirmed by the initial diagnostic polysomnography performed in the same laboratory.
A standard procedure, described previously,1 was employed. The starting pressure was determined from the prediction formula utilizing body mass index (BMI), neck circumference (NC), and the AHI determined during diagnostic polysomnography:
Ppred = (0.16 x BMI) + (0.13 x NC) + (0.04 x AHI) - 5.12
[]CPAP titration study began with the pressure set to Ppred rounded off to the nearest integer. If the AHI at this pressure was < 10, the pressure was decreased in 1 cm H2O increments until the AHI became > 10. If the AHI at Ppred was > 10, the pressure was increased in 1 cm H2O increments until the AHI became < 10. The effective CPAP (Peff) was defined as the lowest pressure at which the patient had an AHI of < 10.
To study the relationship between Ppred and the measured Peff, the data were analyzed in several ways. First, we compared mean values of Peff and Ppred using the paired t test. Second, we used correlation analysis to determine the relationship between these two pressures. Lastly, we examined the histogram of (Peff - Ppred) to determine how well Ppred approximated Peff in individual patients.
[] Results
There were 54 women and 275 men. Their anthropometric and sleep data are given in Table 1 . As a group, the patients were obese, middle-aged, and had moderately severe sleep apnea.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Anthropometric and Sleep Data in All Patients
Adequate titrations were achieved in 276 patients. In the remaining 53 patients, the optimum pressure could not be determined. Table 2 summarizes the results for all patients grouped according to the success of titration. Those with unsuccessful titration are further divided into groups. One group are "overestimated" patients, ie, those in whom AHI was < 10 at Ppred, with an AHI of > 10 not achieved at any pressure. The other group are the "underestimated" patients, ie, those with an AHI > 10 at Ppred, in whom an AHI of < 10 was not achieved at any pressure.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Anthropometric and Sleep Data in Patients According to Success of CPAP Titration*
Generally, patients in whom the algorithm overestimated the pressure tended to be less overweight and had milder sleep apnea than patients in the other two groups. This is may be seen from the mean values for AHI given in Table 2 , and also from the fact that 50% of the overpredicted group had an AHI of < 27, whereas 50% of the underpredicted and successful groups had AHIs of > 44 and > 41, respectively.
In the remaining 276 patients, the titration (whether up or down from the predicted value) was adequate, with the results summarized in Table 3 .
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Patients With Successful CPAP Titration
There was no significant difference between Peff and Ppred (p = 0.46); both variables were significantly correlated (r = 0.73; p = 0.0001).
The relationship between the Ppred and Peff is better seen by examining the distribution of the differences between these two pressures (Fig 1 ).
[]
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
Figure 1. Histogram of the differences between effective and predicted pressures.
We note that in 63% of patients, Ppred was within ± 1 cm H2O of Peff; in 83% of patients, the two pressures were within ± 2 cm H2O; and in 95%, within ± 3 cm H2O.
[] Discussion
We examined a large group of patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration study, using a method that employed a predicted formula to initiate the titration. We found that (1) adequate CPAP titration can be achieved in 84% of patients; and (2) in 83% of patients, the optimum pressure lies within ± 2 cm H2O of the predicted pressure.
We employed a relatively unique, individualized, manual CPAP titration protocol, and did not compare it with any other methods simply because there are no standard protocols. Many laboratories begin titration at 4 or 5 cm H2O, increasing pressures in increments of 1 or 2 cm H2O every 10 to 60 min. However, for a patient who requires > 10 cm H2O pressure to abolish his/her sleep apnea, such a protocol may be inadequate. There may not be enough time for proper titration, or sleep time spent at each pressure may be too short to sample all sleep stages and all positions. There is the danger that the effective pressure determined during the CPAP titration study will be inadequate during a full night of sleep at home. Using the algorithm proposed here would allow Peff to be reached sooner and minimize the risk of running out of time.
Because there is no standard CPAP titration protocol, the criteria for an effective protocol are not clear. It seems reasonable to assume that an effective protocol will have the following: (1) a low rate of unsuccessful titrations, (2) little difference between AHI at Peff as determined during the titration night and AHI at the same pressure during all-night polysomnography, and (3) few pressure increments required to attain Peff during the titration night. There are no data in the literature regarding the first two points. However, there are recent studies3 4 5 6 that allow one to determine the number of pressure increments. All of these studies were performed for the purpose of assessing auto-titrating devices, and in some of them manual CPAP titrations were also carried out. Although none of the authors commented on the number of pressure changes required to achieve the optimum CPAP, we can estimate this from the knowledge of starting pressure, optimum pressure, and pressure increment. In all studies, the initial pressure was 3 to 5 cm H2O, and the final effective pressure was between 7 and 12 cm H2O. Assuming the pressure increment of 1 cm H2O, the number of pressure changes necessary to achieve the effective pressure would be between 3 and 10. In the present study, using a CPAP titration protocol based on the predicted pressure, we found that the mean number of pressure changes was one, ranging from zero to five.
With the development of auto-titrating CPAP systems, manual titrations may soon become a relic of the past. Is it therefore futile to develop and test prediction algorithms for calculating effective CPAP? We do not think so, because even the automated systems require the user to specify starting, minimum, and maximum pressures. Our results indicate that using Ppred to start auto-CPAP and specifying a ± 4 cm H2O range around it will ensure resolution of sleep apnea in almost all patients. In fact, Series and Marc7 concluded in a recent study that the prediction algorithm tested here can be used together with an automatic CPAP system to initiate CPAP titration at home, without a separate titration study.
Another potential use of prediction algorithm is during split-night studies8 and daytime titrations,9 when sleep time available for CPAP titration is short. In such studies, the likelihood of successful titration is increased when the starting pressure is close to the effective pressure, thus requiring fewer pressure increments and increasing the likelihood of successful titration.
We found that in 53 of 329 patients (16%), CPAP titration was inadequate. It is difficult to put this result in proper perspective, because there is no information in the literature on the rate of titration failures seen in sleep laboratories. We attempted to uncover the reasons for this by carefully reviewing the records of patients with failed titrations with respect to the diagnosis, severity of apnea, or anthropometric variables. Although no consistent pattern emerged for all patients, the following facts may explain some of the failures.
There were 11 patients in whom the algorithm was a gross underestimate: AHI was > 10 at Ppred and never dropped to < 10 during titration. However, these patients all belong to a group of apneics in whom CPAP titration may be expected to be difficult. Four had central sleep apnea (which frequently does not respond to CPAP), one had inadequate titration due to persistent leak around the mask, two did not sleep at higher pressures, two had mild sleep apnea (initial AHIs, 14 and 20; final AHIs, 12 and 13) and did not tolerate further increases in pressure, and the remaining two had severe sleep apnea (initial AHIs, 99 and 108, dropping to 25 and 24 at pressures of 15 and 16 cm H2O). In the two patients with severe sleep apnea, there was every indication that with further increases in pressure, AHI would fall to < 10.
There were 42 patients with mild sleep apnea (median AHI, 27) in whom the algorithm produced a gross overestimate of pressure. These patients had AHIs of < 10 at Ppred and never developed sleep apnea despite the pressure being lowered to as low as 3 cm H2O. In 27 of them, loud snoring reappeared during reduction in pressure to < 5 cm H2O; the sleep technologist decided against further reductions in pressure and stopped the titration protocol. In the other 15 patients, no consistent distinct pattern was found; perhaps these patients demonstrated a "false-positive" result during their diagnostic night. We reviewed their weight, alcohol intake, and medications, but could find no difference in these variables between the diagnostic and CPAP titration nights. It is possible that physiologic night-to-night variability in breathing in these patients with mild sleep apnea accounts for our findings.
We conclude that the prediction algorithm based on NC, BMI, and AHI is useful in calculating the starting pressure for initiating CPAP titration in the majority of patients with sleep apnea. Based on previous investigations,7 it may also be useful for autotitration at home. We must emphasize that the algorithm cannot replace a proper CPAP titration study10 ; its usefulness lies in facilitating the titration protocol, not in replacing it.
[] Footnotes
Abbreviations: AHI = apnea/hypopnea index; BMI = body mass index; CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure; NC = neck circumference; Peff = true effective pressure required to abolish apneas; Ppred = algorithm-predicted pressure required to abolish apneas
Received for publication May 5, 1999. Accepted for publication September 13, 1999.
[] References
Miljeteig, H, Hoffstein, V (1993) Determinants of continuous posi- tive airway pressure level for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 147,1526-1530[ISI][Medline]
Hoheisel, GB, Teschler, H (1994) Clinical parameters for the prescription of minimal effective CPAP for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149,A496
Stradling, JR, Barbour, C, Pitson, DJ, et al (1997) Automatic continuous positive airway pressure titration in the laboratory: patient outcomes. Thorax 52,72-75[Abstract]
Konerman, M, Sanner, BM, Vyleta, M, et al (1998) Use of conventional and self-adjusting nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a comparative study. Chest 113,714-718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ficker, JH, Wiest, GH, Lehnert, G, et al (1998) Evaluation of an auto-CPAP device for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Thorax 53,643-648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Scharf, MB, Brannen, DE, McDannold, MD, et al (1996) Computerized adjustable versus fixed NCAP treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 19,491-496[ISI][Medline]
Series, F, Marc, I (1997) Efficacy of automatic continuous positive pressure therapy that uses an estimated required pressure in the treatment of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Ann Intern Med 127,588-595
Strollo, PJ, Jr, Sanders, MH, Costantion, JP, et al (1996) Split-night studies for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep 19,S255-S259[ISI][Medline]
Rosenthal, L, Nykamp, K, Guido, P, et al (1998) Daytime CPAP titration: a viable alternative for patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 114,1056-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gokcebay, N, Iqbal, S, Yang, K, et al (1996) Accuracy of CPAP predicted from anthropometric and polysomnographic indices. Sleep 19,600-601[ISI][Medline]
http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/117/4/1061
-
-
Richard, go to cpapauction.com and keep an eye out for a lightly used, or occasionally even new, Resmed S8 AutoSet II or Resmed S8 AutoSet Vantage. You wouldn't regret having one of those babies at all! Fully data capable, easy access to the important data via the LCD. And I strongly suspect a better PAP than the S9 for durability, etc.
Richard Morgan said:Thanks Rock, The only problem is they are a bit out of my price range at the moment. I need a less expensive alternative or just keep my ResMed S7 a while longer. I was jusr intrigued by the data capability of the newer ones.
© 2024 Created by The SleepGuide Crew.
Powered by
